Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 F.3d 145 - United States v. Ferrarini

United States v. Ferrarini’s Empirical Analysis

219 F.3d 145 · 2000

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2023
most recently cited

37 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2023 · most notably Kagan v. United States (2001), United States v. Quattrone (2006)

37 federal appellate ·

580200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cupp v. Naughten · Mistretta v. United States · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · In re Oliver · Rock v. Arkansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Financial institution,” as used in this guideline, is defined to include any institution described in 18 U.S.C. §§ 20 , 656, 657, 1005-1007, and 1014; any state or foreign bank, trust company, credit union, insurance company, investment company, mutual fund, savings (building and loan) association, union or employee pension fund; any health, medical or hospital insurance association; brokers and dealers registered, or required to be registered, with the Securities and Exchange Commission; futures commodity merchants and commodity pool operators registered, or required to be registered, with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission; and any similar entity, whether or not insured by the federal government.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`the evidence is such that a rational juror may reach [the] conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt. . . . that [the defendant] was aware of a high probability [of the fact in dispute] and consciously avoided confirming that fact'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In such circumstances, a conscious avoidance instruction to the jury `permits a finding of knowledge even where there is no evidence that the defendant possessed actual knowledge.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.