Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 F.3d 784 - Folorunso Adeyinka Afolayan Grace Afolayans v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Folorunso Adeyinka Afolayan Grace Afolayans v. Immigration and Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis

219 F.3d 784 · 2000

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Mathews v. Diaz · Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Fiallo Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Due Process Clause requires only that an alien receive notice and a fair hearing where the INS must prove by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the alien is subject to deportation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “compels us to conclude that Congress clearly intended a retroactive application of the stop-time measure . . . Landgraf requires no further examination of this issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When reviewing an agency decision, [the court] accord[s] substantial deference to the agency's interpretation of the statutes and regulations it administers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.