Charmaine Hunter v. Lonnie Namanny’s Empirical Analysis
219 F.3d 825 · 2000
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably United States v. Allen (2001), Chambers v. Pennycook (2011)
19 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Brady v. State of Maryland · Illinois v. Gates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t remains an open question in this circuit whether an excessive force claim requires some minimum level of injury,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] reconstructed affidavit must also include material allegedly omitted with reckless disregard of the truth, [citations omitted] Where, as here, the allegedly omitted information would have been clearly critical to the probable cause determination, recklessness may be inferred.”). . It appears doubtful that the Eighth Circuit would conclude that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether, given the facts most favorable to the plaintiffs, there are no genuine issues of material fact as to whether a reasonable official would have known that the alleged action violated that right,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.