Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 F.3d 895 - Pershing Park Villas Homeowners Association Csp-Pershing Ltd Harry Bigham v. United Pacific Insurance Company Reliance Insurance Co

Pershing Park Villas Homeowners Association Csp-Pershing Ltd Harry Bigham v. United Pacific Insurance Company Reliance Insurance Co’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

6 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Allen v. Wright · Bender v. Williamsport Area School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Constitutional standing concerns whether the plaintiff's personal stake in the lawsuit is sufficient to make out a concrete 'case' or 'controversy' to which the federal judicial power may extend under Article III, § 2.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is also unreasonable ... the insurer will be liable for consequential damages regardless of foreseeability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]hough emotional distress must be severe to be actionable by itself, no heightened showing is required to obtain damages for mental suffering that naturally ensues from the commission of a distinct and independent tort. The requirement of severity is designed to address "`the fear of fictitious or trivial claims, distrust of the proof offered, and the difficulty of setting up any satisfactory boundaries to liability' "when no injury other than emotional distress is alleged. These concerns are mitigated when "substantial damages for loss of property" corroborate the plaintiff's mental suffering. A plaintiff may therefore recover damages for nonsevere emotional distress ensuing from tortious conduct that also results in significant economic loss.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.