Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 F.3d 905 - Paul Wright v. Chase Riveland

Paul Wright v. Chase Riveland’s Empirical Analysis

219 F.3d 905 · 1999

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
6
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably United States v. Novak (2007), Danvers Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co. (2005)

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions

420199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Mathews v. Eldridge · Hudson v. Palmer · United States v. Halper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) Five percent to the public safety and education account for the purpose of crime victims' compensation; (ii) Ten percent to a department personal inmate savings account; and (iii) Twenty percent to the department to contribute to the cost of incarceration.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “regardless of whether an inmate committed an offense for which restitution is appropriate and regardless of whether the inmate had already been ordered to pay court-ordered restitution at sentencing”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a civil sanction that cannot fairly be said solely to serve a remedial purpose, but rather can only be explained as also serving either retributive or deterrent purposes, is punishment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.