Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 FRD 262 - In re Sentencing

In re Sentencing’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 991

Relies on Koon v. United States · Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc. · United States v. Lara · United States v. Mallon · United States v. Hastings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judge applies mental impressions of many tangible and intangible factors when imposing a sentence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A[n appellate court's] de novo review would be factually deficient without a video record of the district court's sentencing hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.