Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 Ga. 601 - Branch v. Branch

Branch v. Branch’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2018

5 state decisions

20196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gaston v. Shunk Plow Co. · Briesnick v. Briesnick · Stokes v. Stokes · Hortman v. Georgia Board of Dental Examiners · Lee v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Ga. Code. Ann.] § 24-105 does not require a jury trial in the situation here where the respondent is cited for refusing to pay an alimony judgment[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the respondent in contempt proceedings is not entitled to a trial by jury except where a jury trial is expressly provided by statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.