Froelich v. Werbin’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2000
2 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Froelich v. Adair · Dotson v. McLaughlin · Froelich v. Werbin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““One who appropriates to his own use or benefit the name or likeness of another is subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nelson v. Times
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.