Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 Kan. 584 - Simpson v. Davis

Simpson v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
6
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably Durflinger v. Artiles (1983), Denison State Bank v. Madeira (1982)

2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

39019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lipman v. Lustig · Dufrene v. Faget · Dufrene v. Faget · Cohen v. Weber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In ruling on a motion for a directed verdict pursuant to K.S.A. 60-250, the court is required to resolve all facts and inferences reasonably to be drawn from the evidence in favor of the party against whom the ruling is sought, and where the evidence is such that reasonable minds could reach different conclusions thereon, the motion must be denied and the matter submitted to the jury. . . .” (p. 589.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““A verdict cannot be upset if there is any evidence in the record to support it, where such issue is clearly presented without complicating factors, but such rule yields to the impact of admissions made by a party in his testimony while a witness in the case, and such admissions are binding and conclusive upon him if uncontradicted or unexplained, whether such admissions are elicited on direct examination or on cross examination of the party.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.