Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 Minn. 112 - Cranak v. Link

Cranak v. Link’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1961
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1961

5 state decisions

30194419501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Lamb v. Cunningham · Dreyfus v. Boone · Grannis v. Board of County Commissioners · Curtis v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad · State Ex Rel. Tamminen v. City of Eveleth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “““ * * Without the charter provisions, it is well settled that a taxpayer may, when the situation warrants, maintain an action to restrain unlawful disbursements of public moneys; to recover for the use of the public subdivision entitled thereto money that has been illegally disbursed, as well as to restrain illegal action on the part of public officials.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““* * * when the question is one of common or general interest to many persons, or when those who might be made parties are numerous, and it is impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of all.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““* * * rjkg Board [Board of Estimate and Taxation], subject to the provisions of the Civil Service Chapter of this Charter, shall have power to appoint a Secretary and such other employes as it may deem necessary * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.