Cranak v. Link’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1961
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Lamb v. Cunningham · Dreyfus v. Boone · Grannis v. Board of County Commissioners · Curtis v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls Railroad · State Ex Rel. Tamminen v. City of Eveleth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“““ * * Without the charter provisions, it is well settled that a taxpayer may, when the situation warrants, maintain an action to restrain unlawful disbursements of public moneys; to recover for the use of the public subdivision entitled thereto money that has been illegally disbursed, as well as to restrain illegal action on the part of public officials.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillips v. Brandt““* * * when the question is one of common or general interest to many persons, or when those who might be made parties are numerous, and it is impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of all.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Phillips v. Brandt““* * * rjkg Board [Board of Estimate and Taxation], subject to the provisions of the Civil Service Chapter of this Charter, shall have power to appoint a Secretary and such other employes as it may deem necessary * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.