Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 Minn. 241 - Jallo v. Jallo

Jallo v. Jallo’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2018

6 state decisions

3019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Herrick v. Morrill · Bigelow v. Chatterton · Herrick v. Ammerman · Brennan v. Friedell · Grimm v. Grimm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ t* * * ^ ig apparent * * * that all the provisions of the title in relation to the notice of sales by sheriffs on execution, are made applicable to sales of lands under a judgment in partition. * * * If this be a correct conclusion, then, if the referee in this case had omitted altogether to give a notice of sale, the sale to the purchasers would not have been invalid; if made in good faith without notice of any such omission. If cm entire omission to give notice of the sale would not invalidate the sale, cer- ta/inly a defective and irregular notice could not have this effect.’ (Italics supplied.)” 219 Minn. 246 , 17 N. W. 2d 712 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The sale may be by public auction to the highest bidder for cash, upon published notice in the manner required for the sale of real property on execution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.