Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 Minn. 297 - State Ex Rel. Coduti v. Hauser

State Ex Rel. Coduti v. Hauser’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Carter v. Gallagher (1971), Starkweather v. Blair (1955)

3 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

12019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Runge v. Anderson · State Ex Rel. Timo v. Juvenile Court · Freeman v. City of Minneapolis · State ex rel. Schwartzkopf v. City Council of Brainerd · State ex rel. McGill v. Cook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The rules of the Commission, having all the force and effect of statutory law, should be sustained unless they violate constitutional guaranties, controlling state legislation or the provisions of the [Minneapolis home-rule] charter pursuant to which they were adopted.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[bjefore the petitioner for a writ of mandamus is entitled thereto, he must show more than that there is a public wrong specifically injurious to him. He must show that such wrong consists of some failure of official duty clearly imposed by law, and that there is no other adequate specific legal remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.