Keller v. Henvit’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2012
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on William Weisman Holding Co. v. Miller · Bartleson v. Munson · O'Neil v. A. F. Oys & Sons, Inc. · Mutual Trust Life Insurance Co. v. Berg · Berryhill v. Healey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The judgment in an unlawful detainer action determines only the right to the present possession and is not a bar to an action involving the title or the equitable rights of the parties. Such matters, including counterclaims, cannot be litigated in such action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carlson v. Lilyerd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.