Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

219 N.C. 331

13 S.E.2d 529

State v. . Gardner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1941

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1941-03-19

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1941-03-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1968

9 state decisions

50194119501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WiNBORNE, J.

¶1 It appearing upon the face of the bill of indictment that no crime is charged therein, the motion to quash it is well taken.

¶2 The wording and phraseology in the bill of indictment clearly indicate that it is drawn under the provisions of section 4441 of Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina, 1919, as amended by Public Laws 1925, chapter 290, pertaining to abandonment. That statute provides that “if any husband shall wilfully abandon his wife without providing adequate support for such wife, and the children which he may have begotten upon her, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor: Provided, that the abandonment of children by the father shall constitute a continuing offense . . But this being a penal statute, it must be strictly construed. Hence, the children there referred to, are limited to those which the husband “may have begotten upon” the wife. It has no application to illegitimate children. Therefore, while undertaking to charge a crime under the statute, the descriptive words relating to the illegitimacy of the child take the charge out of the statute.

¶3 Furthermore, there is in this State no statutory crime of abandonment of an illegitimate child, and no such crime existed at common law.

¶4 As defendant was not tried in the Superior Court upon warrant issued out of general county court of Buncombe County, the question as to the sufficiency of the warrant may not be raised on this appeal.

¶5 The judgment below is

¶6 Reversed.

/219/nc/331 · .json · Public domain