Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 N.C. 365 - State v. . Williams

State v. . Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2009

16 state decisions

401941195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “strong or weak depending upon the circumstances of the case and the length of time intervening between the larceny of the goods and the discovery of them in [the] defendant's possession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.