State v. Alshaif’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Padilla v. Kentucky · Saffle v. Parks · Sawyer v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Padilla raises the question of the extent to which attorneys can be expected to anticipate the expansion of their obligations under Strickland [ v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) ] and the Sixth Amendment. We conclude that Padilla was a significant departure from prior requirements and hold that the decision therefore created a new rule, the retroactive application of which would be unreasonable . We therefore hold that the trial court did not err by concluding that Padilla was inapplicable to Defendant's case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.