Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 Neb. 420 - State v. Austin

State v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2009

23 state decisions

110198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Argersinger v. Hamlin · Scott v. Illinois · State v. Long · State v. Korf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution require only that no indigent criminal defendant be sentenced to a term of imprisonment unless the State has afforded him the right to assistance of appointed counsel in his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.