State v. Reginald Roach (068874)’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
May 2020
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · California v. Green · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Freeman v. United States · District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is not the case ... that anyone whose testimony may be relevant in establishing the chain of custody, authenticity of the sample, or accuracy of the testing device, must appear in person as part of the prosecution's case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“embraces a different approach to determining whether the use of forensic evidence violates the Confrontation Clause, and there is no narrow rule that would have the support of a majority of the Supreme Court,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“did not perform the testing procedures that provided the basis for the DNA profile developed from the perpetrator's evidence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.