219 N.J. Super. 412 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1990
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bruton v. United States · E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Maloney · United States v. Berkowitz · State v. Coleman · United States v. Crawford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the jury, in order to accept the core of testimony offered on behalf of one [defendant], was forced not only to reject the other but to convict as well.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the defenses antagonistic to each other but not necessarily irreconcilable or mutually exclusive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“theory which is premised on the concert of action between the two.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.