¶1 Judgment affirmed on authority of People v. Ringe (197 N. Y. 143).
¶2 Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Hiscock, Collin, Ouddebaok and Hogan, JJ. Not voting: Pound, J.
219 N.Y. 562
114 N.E 1065
Decided October 24, 1916
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1916-10-24
<p>Appeal from a ■ judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 30,1915; which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the city of New York sustaining a demurrer to an information charging defendant with unlawfully engaging in business as an undertaker without having first obtained a license as required by section 295 of the Public Health Law, as amended by chapter 71 of the Laws of 1913. The Appellate Division held the statute unconstitutional.</p>
Relies on People v. . Ringe
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1916-10-24
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1962
1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Judgment affirmed on authority of People v. Ringe (197 N. Y. 143).
¶2 Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Hiscock, Collin, Ouddebaok and Hogan, JJ. Not voting: Pound, J.