Cary v. Mason County’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation Commission · Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp. · 127 Wash. 2d 874 - Covell v. City of Seattle · Quadrant Corp. v. STATE, GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD. · Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A system of assessments shall classify lands in the conservation district into suitable classifications according to benefits conferred or to be conferred by the activities of the conservation district, determine an annual per acre rate of assessment for each classification of land, and indicate the total amount of special assessments proposed to be obtained from each classification of lands. Lands deemed not to receive benefit from the activities of the conservation district shall be placed into a separate classification and shall not be subject to the special assessments. An annual assessment rate shall be stated as either uniform annual per acre amount, or an annual flat rate per parcel plus a uniform annual rate per acre amount, for each classification of land.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cary v. Mason County
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.