Cain v. State

¶1Affirmed. See Scott v. State, 46 So.3d 529, 532-33 (Fla. 2009) (any error in trial court’s finding that defendant’s motion for postconviction DNA testing was technically insufficient was harmless where defendant’s motion for postconviction DNA testing was legally insufficient because he failed to show a reasonable probability existed that the test results would exonerate him).