Aurelius v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1962
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. Teel · Eylar v. Eylar · Coats v. Elliott · 24 Tex. Civ. App. 554 - Turner v. Grobe · 41 Tex. Civ. App. 308 - Humphrey v. Beaumont Irrigating Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As before stated, while it is shown that the premises were fenced, there is nothing in the evidence to show that they were so connected with the ranch of the plaintiff as to impose on a prospective purchaser, as a matter of law, the duty to make inquiry of the occupant of appellant's ranch house, in order that such purchaser might be held free from the imputation of a lack of due diligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.