Haynes v. Beceiro’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 224th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co. · City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Authority · Coker v. Coker · Casso v. Brand · Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“include other physicians and surgeons as deemed necessary by the surgeon named in the form. Therefore, when [Haynes] gave her written consent for the [named surgeon] “and such associates” to perform the surgery specified in the Disclosure and Consent form, she consented to Beceiro performing any part of that surgery “[the named surgeon] may deem necessary, to treat [her] condition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tipton v. Isaacs
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.