Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 SW3D 295 - Strobel v. Strobel

Strobel v. Strobel’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Russell v. Russell · In Re Marriage of Hendrix · Speer v. Colon · Alberswerth v. Alberswerth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Determining custody and custodial arrangements of children in dissolution actions is one of the most important and most sensitive duties of the court. The legislature has mandated written findings detailing the specific relevant factors that made the chosen arrangement in the best interests of the child. Written findings are necessary unless the parties have “agreed to a custodial arrangement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Rule 84.13(b) provides: “No appellate court shall reverse any judgment unless it finds that error was committed by the trial court materially affecting the merits of the action.” The judgment here permits us to engage in meaningful review. The findings made support the judgment entered, and any deficiencies therein are not material to the merits of this action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.