Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 SW3D 335 - Ex Parte Lewis

Ex Parte Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

67 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth))

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Johnson v. Zerbst · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Jorn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the prosecutor was aware but consciously disregarded the risk that an objectionable event for which he was responsible would require a mistrial at the defendant's request.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “rule under the Texas Constitution is the rule articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Oregon v. Kennedy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]e think, that in all cases of this nature, the law has invested Courts of justice with authority to discharge a jury for giving any verdict, whenever, in their opinion, taking all circumstances into consideration, there is a manifest necessity for the act, or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated. They are to exercise a sound discretion on the subject; and it is impossible to define all the circumstances, which would render it proper to interfere. To be sure, the power ought to be used with the greatest of caution, under urgent circumstances, and for very plain and obvious causes.... But, after all, they have the right to order the discharge; and the security which the public have for the faithful, sound, and conscientious exercise of discretion, rests, in this, as in other cases, upon the responsibility of the Judges, under their oaths of office.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.