Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 SW3D 391 - Bahm v. State

Bahm v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso))

Relationships

Relies on Bearden v. State · Bahm v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is applicable only to cases where the motion is grounded on matters that are not already a part of the case record.” Bahm v. State, 219 S.W.3d 391, 395 (Tex.Crim.App.2007). As Jimenez concedes in her brief, the amended motion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.