Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

219 S.W.3d 789

Vaughn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 2007

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2007-04-17

Relies on State v. Vaughn

Decided 2007-04-17

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Kenneth Vaughn (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, after holding an evidentiary hearing, of his post-conviction Rule 29.15 1 motion. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of felony burglary in the second degree in violation of Section 569.170 2 and misdemeanor stealing in violation of Section 570.030, and sentenced as a persistent felony offender pursuant to Section 558.016 to concurrent terms of imprisonment for eight years and one year, respectively. 3

¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings- and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

¶4 . All rule citations are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise stated.

2

¶5 . All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise stated.

3

¶6 .This court affirmed Movant’s conviction in State v. Vaughn, 136 S.W.3d 125 (Mo.App. E.D.2004).

/219/sw3d/789 · .json · Public domain