Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 U.S. 575 - Noble State Bank v. Haskell

Noble State Bank v. Haskell’s Empirical Analysis

219 U.S. 575 · 1911

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 9 district · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2022 · most notably Meyer v. State of Nebraska (1923), Buchanan v. Warley (1917)

9 federal appellate · 9 district · 40 state decisions — followed in 15 states

200191119201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boyd v. United States · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Chicago Co v. City of Chicago · Munn v. Illinois · Lawton v. Steele

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We fully understand * * * the very powerful argument that can be made against the wisdom of the legislation, but on that point we have nothing to say as it is not our concern.” 31 S.Ct., at 300.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The analysis of the police power, whether correct or not, was intended to indicate an interpretation of what has taken place in the past not to give a new or wider scope to the power.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““For in this case there is no out and out unconditional taking at all. The payment can be avoided by going out of tlie banking business, and is required only as a condition for keeping- on, from corporations created by tlie state.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.