Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 VA 204 - Schrum v. Commonwealth

Schrum v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2008 · most notably State v. Rusk (1981), 11 Va. App. 380 - Ferrell v. Commonwealth (1990)

24 state decisions

1001978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Doyle v. Ohio · Comfort v. California · Reid v. Commonwealth · Dean v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t does not comport with due process to permit the prosecution during the trial to call attention to his silence at the time of arrest and to insist that because he did not speak about the facts of the case at that time, as he was told he need not do, an unfavorable inference might be drawn as to the truth of his trial testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.