Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 Va. 759 - Ansell v. Commonwealth

Ansell v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

131
cited by 131 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 128 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Armstrong v. Commonwealth (2002), Holloman v. Commonwealth (1980)

3 federal appellate · 128 state decisions

57019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blitz v. Boog · Commonwealth v. Ellett · 102 Ga. App. 790 - Curtis v. State · State v. Carlson · Wesley v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]pon a second or subsequent conviction”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “an unreasonably restrictive interpretation of the statute”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The 1976 Amendment [to Code § 18.2-53.1] restricted the application of the statute to the serious felonies therein enumerated rather than having it apply to all felonies. However, the severity of the punishment was significantly increased. Inflexible penalties replaced the wide range of discretionary penalties originally authorized; trial courts were prohibited from suspending the sentence, in whole or in part, or placing the offender on probation; and the punishment was required to run consecutively rather than concurrently with the punishment imposed for commission of the primary felony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.