Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 219 W. Va. 747 - State v. Finley

219 W. Va. 747 - State v. Finley’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Deck v. Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we find no diseernable difference in the prejudicial effect upon a jury of seeing a person in prison garb versus seeing that person in shackles in light of the decision the jury is obliged to make at this portion of the trial. At the penalty phase, the jury is no longer looking narrowly at the circumstances surrounding the charged offense. In order to make a recommendation regarding mercy, the jury is bound to look at the broader picture of the defendant’s the defendant’s past, present and future according to the evidence before order to reach its decision regarding whether the defendant is a person who is worthy of the chance to regain freedom.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.