Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 A.D. 16

In re Hatch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1897-07-01

Appeal by Horace H. Chittenden, assignee of the estate of A. S. Hatch & Company and A. S. Hatch, individually, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York oh the 5th day of April, 1897, confirming the report of a referee, establishing claims against the assigned estate, and granting an extra allowance of costs.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1983

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1897-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Patterson, J.:

¶1I concur in the conclusion that the claim of Huntington cannot be set off against the indebtedness to the assignee, but I think the referee was authorized, under the order and the acquiescence of the assignee in the procedure, to determine what deduction, if any, should be allowed to Huntington for his expenses in collecting the claims against Attrill, and that there was sufficient proof to justify the allowance in full of the amount of the charges of Mr. Tweed and Mr. Evarts.

¶2Order, so far as it fixes the amount of the claims of Huntington against the assigned estates, affirmed; in all other respects, reversed, without costs.

/22/ad/16 · .json · Public domain