Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 A.D.2d 1009

Seward v. Motz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1964-12-10

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2012

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1964-12-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Judgment insofar as appealed from and order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the defendant shall, within 10 days, stipulate to increase the verdict to the sum of $25,000, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, with costs to the appellant. Memorandum: The verdict of the jury was so inadequate as to shock judicial conscience. (Appeal from part of a judgment of Niagara Trial Term for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action; also appeal from order denying a motion for a new trial.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Veeehio, JJ.

/22/ad2d/1009 · .json · Public domain