Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 A.D.3d 506

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2005-10-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2008

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Application by the appellant for a writ of coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 14, 2003 (People v King, 307 AD2d 302 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered March 24, 1997.

¶2Ordered that the application is denied.

¶3The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 *507US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Crane, J.P., Ritter, Krausman and Mastro, JJ., concur.

/22/ad3d/506 · .json · Public domain