Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 A.D.3d 647

Lohan v. Teja

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2005-10-17

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2010

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-10-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and fraud, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), dated December 17, 2004, as denied its motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7).

¶2Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

¶3As the Supreme Court correctly determined, the defendant seller failed to demonstrate his entitlement to dismissal of the plaintiffs’ complaint, alleging that they were induced to purchase the subject premises as a result of the defendant’s active concealment of a mold infestation (see Jablonski v Rapalje, 14 AD3d 484 [2005]).

¶4The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Covello, JJ., concur.

/22/ad3d/647 · .json · Public domain