Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 ALA 65 - Ex parte McCrary

Ex parte McCrary’s Empirical Analysis

1853

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
8
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 31 Ala. App. 91 - Lee v. State (1943), Noles v. State (1854)

28 state decisions

5018531860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Croom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The language of the constitution is: ‘All persons shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient securities, except for capital offences where the proof is evident or the presumption great.’ The obvious intention of the framers of the constitution, in denying to the legislature the right to pass any laws impairing the right of bail, except in capital cases, was, as to these offences, to leave them free to pass such laws as they please. This clause of the bill of rights in the constitution was, many years since, made part of the statute law of the State, and was incorporated in the Penal Code. * * *»”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"... to the juries the power of saying, in cases of murder in the first degree, whether the accused shall suffer death, or go to the penitentiary for life.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.