Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Ala. App. 107 - Burk v. State

22 Ala. App. 107 - Burk v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
September 1992
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 1992

22 state decisions

6019271930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 21 Ala. App. 140 - Lancaster v. State · 21 Ala. App. 140 - Nunnley v. State · Jones v. State · 20 Ala. App. 559 - Jaco v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]ntent can only be shown by facts and circumstances from which the jury is authorized to draw the inference.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “everything done and said in furtherance of the common design by either of the parties to the conspiracy is competent evidence against the other and to be considered by the jury in making up their verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.