Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 Ala. App. 263

114 So 631

Meinhardt v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1927

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1927-11-29

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1946

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-11-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BRICKEN, P. J.

¶1 This appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the offense of violating the state quarantine laws for live stock. The jury assessed a fine of $10, and judgment of conviction was accordingly pronounced and entered.

¶2 There is no bill of exceptions; the appeal is predicated upon the record proper. So far as the judgment of conviction is concerned, the cause will be affirmed; but, as there appears no sentence of the court relative to the costs incident upon the trial of this cause, it will of necessity be remanded for proper sentence. Code 1923, § 5291.

¶3 Affirmed. Remanded for proper sentence.

/22/alaapp/263 · .json · Public domain