Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 Ala. App. 299

115 So 72

Thompson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1928

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1928-01-10

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1972

2 state decisions

Relies on 19 Ala. App. 539 - Tuggle v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1928-01-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SAMFORD, J.

¶1 But two exceptions are reserved for review, and they relate to the oral charge of the court. A defendant may be an accessory to the possession of a still, just' as he may be an accessory to any other crime, and if one is in possession of a still, and is aided and abetted by another, both are equally guilty. The court’s charge was free from error, and, there being no error apparent on the trial, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

¶2 The sentence is indefinite, and therefore the cause is remanded to the circuit court for proper sentence. Tuggle v. State, 19 Ala. App. 539, 98 So. 700.

¶3 Affirmed, and remanded for sentence.

/22/alaapp/299 · .json · Public domain