Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Ala. App. 373 - Holmes v. State

22 Ala. App. 373 - Holmes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2001 · most notably 33 Ala. App. 414 - Lovejoy v. State (1948), 34 Ala. App. 253 - Williams v. State (1948)

40 state decisions

180192819301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Campbell v. State · 19 Ala. App. 11 - Register v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * [T]he interests of public justice and the punishment and prevention of crime on the one hand, and principles of fairness toward the prisoner on the other, demand that the presiding judge should not entertain, or, at least should not manifest, any partiality for or against the accused during the examination of the witnesses. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It was not only within the power of the court to propound questions to witnesses, but if justice required, or if it appeared necessary, it was the duty of the court so to do, and such action upon the part of the court cannot be construed as an aid to the prosecution or as being prejudicial to the substantial rights of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]ith certain exceptions, no rule of law exists which limits the power of a judge in a criminal trial to interrogate a witness during his examination. He may ask any question which either the state or the accused had the right to ask, or which it was their duty to ask, but which has been omitted, if the answer may be relevant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.