Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 Ala. App. 436

116 So 507

Young v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1928

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1928-04-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1948

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1928-04-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This court en banc has considered the record in this.appeal. We are of the opinion that the defendant was entitled to the affirmative charge as to the first count of the indictment, and, further, that the alleged confession of the defendant as to the crime charged in said first count was improperly admitted, there being no evidence to. prove the corpus delicti of the offense therein charged.

¶2 Other questions need not be considered.

¶3 Reversed and remanded.

/22/alaapp/436 · .json · Public domain