Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 Ala. App. 534

117 So 507

Glass v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1928

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1928-06-26

Relies on 21 Ala. App. 74 - Odum v. Coldwell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1928-06-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 1990 · most notably Utley v. City of St Petersburg Fla (1934), Sullivan v. City of Tampa (1931)

26 state decisions

17019281930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SAMFORD, J.

¶1 The bill of exceptions was presented to the presiding judge on December 24, 1927, and not signed toy him until the 23d day of March, 1928, more than 60 days after the presentation. The Attorney General moves the court to strike the bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions not having been signed within 60 days after presentation must be stricken. Code 1923, § 6433.; Odum v. Coldwell, 21 Ala. App. 74, 105 So. 398. The motion of the Attorney General to strike the bill of exceptions is granted.

¶2 This leaves the appeal on the record proper, and’finding no error therein the judgment is affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

/22/alaapp/534 · .json · Public domain