Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Ala. App. 536 - Green v. State

22 Ala. App. 536 - Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
July 1984
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 1984

16 state decisions

601928193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 21 Ala. App. 520 - Holland v. State · Morrison v. State · Holland v. State · Storrs v. State · 22 Ala. App. 396 - Poe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We do not hold that a person cannot be guilty of two or more possessions of whisky at one and the same time. But we do hold that where the premises are the same and the time is the same, the possession of all the whisky on the premises of which the owner has a guilty knowledge, and of which he has control, is one possession and may not be split up into numerous prosecutions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.