Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1928-11-27
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1993
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶2
Questions raised on the admission of evidence would not authorize a reversal even if error. The testimony adduced did not, and could not, affect the substantial rights of the defendant.
¶3
There is no error, and the judgment is affirmed.