¶1 The only insistence of error is the refusal of the trial court to give the general charge for defendant. The facts and circumstances surrounding the finding of the whisky were sufficient to warrant the verdict returned by the jury, and meets the requirements of the rule as laid down- in Cannon v. State, 17 Ala. App. 82, 81 So. 860. Upon reading the entire record in this case, we have no doubt that the defendant has had a fa!ir trial, and that the verdict returned was justified by the evidence. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is aflirmed. Affirmed.
22 Ala. App. 674
115 So 923
Hilyer v. State
Decided January 10, 1928
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1928-01-10
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1929
1 state decisions
Relies on 17 Ala. App. 82 - Cannon v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1928-01-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →