Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 Ala. App. 677

112 So 923

Kendrick v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1927

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1927-05-24

Decided 1927-05-24

SAMPORD, J.

¶1 Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. There is not sufficient evidence in this case to support the verdict of the jury. The court- should have granted the motion for a new trial. The judgment of conviction must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

/22/alaapp/677 · .json · Public domain