¶1 Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. There is not sufficient evidence in this case to support the verdict of the jury. The court- should have granted the motion for a new trial. The judgment of conviction must be reversed, and the cause remanded.
22 Ala. App. 677
112 So 923
Kendrick v. State
Decided May 24, 1927
Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1927-05-24
Decided 1927-05-24