Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Ariz. App. 365 - Toler v. Industrial Commission

22 Ariz. App. 365 - Toler v. Industrial Commission’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2018

14 state decisions

6019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNicol's Case · Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Cardillo · Bedwell v. Industrial Commission · Howard v. Harwood's Restaurant Co. · Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. Gilbert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Kiewit and Colvert indicate that Arizona courts recognize that the friction and strain of employment can often precipitate assaults even in the absence of other job-related factors. Nevertheless, our courts have not translated this recognition into an application of a “but-for” or “positional risk” theory making such assaults automatically compensable. Since the issue may be reasonably resolved without unnecessary disruption of our previous interpretations of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, we need not adopt such a broad theory in this case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “except for routine or work-related contact, [the parties] had no personal association prior to the events leading to the assault”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.