22 Ariz. App. 397 - Long v. Garrett’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1992
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Davis v. Mississippi · Henderson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“B. Any order issued pursuant to the provisions of this section shall specify the following: 7. The time that such evidence shall be taken except that no person may be detained for a period of more than three hours for the purpose of taking evidence. 8. The period of time, not exceeding fifteen days, during which the order shall continue in force and effect. If the order is not executed within fifteen days, a new order may be issued, pursuant to the provisions of this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wedding“The order shall require the presence of the ... individual at such time ... as the court shall direct____”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wedding
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.