22 Ariz. App. 69 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2016
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stone v. Stidham · Proffit v. Proffit · 182 Cal. App. 2d 707 - Henry v. Henry · 17 Ariz. App. 29 - Bickel v. Bickel · 21 Ariz. App. 284 - Fox v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPA
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ttorney's fees awarded in a decree of divorce are enforceable by post judgment contempt in the same manner as alimony or child support could be enforced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Danielson v. Evans“is an adjudication of her need of such support in order to litigate with her husband upon an equal basis,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“attorney's fees are as much for the wife's support as payments made directly to her ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.